|
Post by Noelia on Jun 5, 2007 18:01:12 GMT -3
This Elton John's song says:
Goodbye England's rose From a country lost without your soul Who'll miss the wings of your compassion More than you'll ever know
And my question is, can you apply "who" to a noun like "country" or was it an exception, to make it sound more emotional, to represent all the people who'll miss Diana?
|
|
|
Post by sendai on Jun 5, 2007 20:55:56 GMT -3
I personally would say "that", but "who" sounds okay to me. I guess it's okay since a country consists of people. www.m-w.com says: who: used as a function word to introduce a relative clause; used especially in reference to persons <my father, who was a lawyer> but also in reference to groups <a generation who had known nothing but war -- R. B. West> or to animals <dogs who...fawn all over tramps -- Nigel Balchin> or to inanimate objects especially with the implication that the reference is really to a person <earlier sources who maintain a Davidic ancestry -- F. M. Cross> -- used by speakers on all educational levels and by many reputable writers, though disapproved by some grammarians, as the object of a verb or a following preposition <a character who we are meant to pity -- Times Literary Supplement>
|
|
|
Post by Noelia on Jun 6, 2007 12:17:40 GMT -3
Thanks... still sounds weird to me though saying "who" instead of "that" I only heard it in this song. But it makes sense, since the world is full of "who's"
|
|
|
Post by johnr on Jun 6, 2007 12:22:48 GMT -3
yo también diría 'who'.
|
|